نظرانداز کرکے مرکزی مواد پر جائیں

The end of the two-day talks held between Pakistan and India showed some results, but it was apparent no drastic changes were on the agenda

ISLAMABAD: The end of the two-day talks held between Pakistan and India showed some results, but it was apparent no drastic changes were on the agenda. Both sides have agreed to extend two vital accords on the pre-notification of ballistic missile tests and reducing the risk of accidents related to nuclear weapons for another five years.


The agreements were reached at the end of the expert-level talks in Islamabad, taking place to discuss nuclear and conventional confidence building measures (CBMs). The parleys, part of the peace process resumed earlier this year between the two neighbours, were held in a ‘cordial and constructive atmosphere,’ said a statement issued by the foreign office.

The two sides agreed to recommend to their foreign secretaries to extend the validity of the “Agreement on Reducing the Risk from Accidents Relating to Nuclear Weapons” for another five years, it said. They also decided to renew agreement on the pre-notification of ballistic missile tests. The term of the existing arrangement is believed to expire in February next year.

Despite earlier indications, the two countries appear fail to expand the scope of current agreement by also including cruise missile tests.

However, while few concrete steps were taken at this point in time, the two sides did appear to lay the foundation for more substantive action. During the talks, both sides reviewed the implementation and strengthening of existing CBMs in the framework of the previous Lahore Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), and agreed to explore possibilities for mutually acceptable additional steps. The two sides also exchanged notes on their security concepts and nuclear doctrines during discussions on nuclear CBMs.

Discussing the nukes

On the topic of nuclear weapons, some differences were apparent. While Islamabad renewed its offer of a ‘strategic restraint regime’ accord, New Delhi pushed for a pledge from Pakistan about ‘no first use of nuclear weapons.’

Indian media claimed that the talks focused on the need for Pakistan to “demonstrate restraint and responsibility” in the nuclear field. The need for greater engagement by Pakistan on multi-lateral negotiations, especially on the Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty (FMCT), also figured in the talks, it said.

Pakistan has long boycotted negotiations on the FMCT, arguing that it has to continue producing fissile material used in nuclear weapons to address the conventional military imbalance with India.

New CBMs

During the talks, the two sides also proposed fresh CBMs in a bid to lower the level of trust-deficit. The new CBMs include a proposal by Islamabad to redeploy heavy weapons at the Line of Control (LoC) in the disputed region of Kashmir and an agreement on the prevention of incidents at sea.

The proposals exchanged by the two sides at the talks will now be forwarded to the foreign secretaries. This was the first meeting of Joint Working Group on nuclear and conventional CBMs in the last four years.

تبصرے

اس بلاگ سے مقبول پوسٹس

News

Ehtasabi Amal Lahore احتسابي عمل لاھور

Pasha, one of the most powerful men in the South Asian nation, told the all-party gathering that US military action against insurgents in Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s intelligence chief on Thursday denied US accusations that the country supports the Haqqani network, an Afghan militant group blamed for an attack on the American embassy in Kabul. “There are other intelligence networks supporting groups who operate inside Afghanistan. We have never paid a penny or provided even a single bullet to the Haqqani network,” Lieutenant-General Ahmed Shuja Pasha told Reuters after meeting political leaders over heavily strained US-Pakistani ties. Pasha, one of the most powerful men in the South Asian nation, told the all-party gathering that US military action against insurgents in Pakistan would be unacceptable and the army would be capable of responding, local media said. But he later said the reports were “baseless”. Pakistan has long faced US demands to attack militants on its side of the border with Afghanistan, but pressure has grown since the top US military officer, Admiral Mike Mullen, accused Pasha’s Inter-Services Intelligence ...

Drone Wars: The rationale.The Drone Wars are the new black.

The Drone Wars are the new black. The once covert, highly-secretive and little talked about strategy of using unmanned aerial vehicles to target suspected terrorists in Pakistan and elsewhere has gone mainstream. And now everyone is talking about it. Even Leon Panetta, the former C.I.A. director, whose old agency doesn't officially admit that its drone program exists, is talking about it. Twice in a matter of hours last week he joked about the C.I.A.'s pension for deploying the ominously-named Predator drones. “Obviously I have a hell of a lot more weapons available to me here than I had at the C.I.A.,” he said, referring to his new post as secretary of defense. “Although the Predators aren’t bad.” Complete coverage: The Drone Wars Later that same day, on the tarmac of a naval air base, he said, coyly, that the use of Predators are “something I was very familiar with in my old job.” Soon after, a Predator armed with hellfire missiles took flight from the runway, bound for Libya...